Climate change: challenges for science and society

Climate change: challenges for science and society

As in other environmental issues, science has been playing a major role in climate change, by detecting the problem, assessing its severity and impacts, predicting its future evolution, as well as working on solutions for it, both in terms of mitigation and adaptation.

As a global problem, much of the research and policy takes place in the international arena, through large scale research projects and intergovernmental negotiation forums (IPCC). However, since, on the one hand, this collective effort requires the involvement of national scientific systems and, on the other hand, local impacts demand specific responses, localised research does matter. National peculiarities regarding the political use of scientific advice and public engagement (both in science and in policy-making) also have a bearing on how this problem is dealt with.

Thus, this project aims to understand how science is tackling the challenge of climate change in Portugal, by:

- characterising the climate change research community (which researchers and institutions are involved; what research subjects are being studied; what is being researched in terms of assessment, mitigation or adaptation; which scientific disciplines are being mobilised; what sources of funding are supporting this research; what interdisciplinary, interinstitutional and international collaborations exist);

- analysing the connections between scientific advice and policy-making in what regards climate change (which experts are being called upon by local and national government to provide advice, what kind of studies are being done by government demand; whether tensions and controversies exist between experts and counter-experts);

- examining science and society relationships concerning climate change (how is scientific information being communicated to the public; what kind of public engagement with science is being promoted; whether societal issues and lay knowledge are being taken into consideration in scientific research).

The methodology of this research project will comprise several stages. The first step is to map out the community of climate change research in Portugal, by conducting a census of research projects, researchers, teams and researchers. Once the major actors have been identified, both in fundamental, applied and commissioned research, interviews will be carried out with project leaders, heads of research centres, doctoral students, local and national government officials in charge of commissioning research or scientific advice, national representatives in international bodies dealing with climate change (such as the IPCC).

This research project will then proceed to examine some case studies. From the list of ongoing research projects, a few will be selected, some concerning assessment, others mitigation, others still adaptation to climate change in Portugal. Some instances of climate change policy making with resort to scientific advice and public participation will also be selected for in-depth analysis.

These case studies will be analysed through a combination of methodologies and techniques: document analysis, interviews with stakeholders (scientists and engineers, local inhabitants, consumers/users of technological innovations, local and national government officials, NGOs, business representatives, architects), localised surveys, focus groups, and ethnographic observation.

Collaboration with teams from other countries in joint projects, for instance Spain and other Mediterranean countries that face similar challenges, is envisaged. This project will also strive to build cooperative ties with other scientific disciplines, including from the natural sciences.

It is expected that this research will contribute not just to the accumulation of scientific knowledge on this pressing issue, but also to improve public engagement with science and policy in dealing with climate change.

Estatuto: 
Proponent entity
Financed: 
No
Keywords: 

Climate Change, Scientific Research, Science for Policy, Public Engagement with Science

As in other environmental issues, science has been playing a major role in climate change, by detecting the problem, assessing its severity and impacts, predicting its future evolution, as well as working on solutions for it, both in terms of mitigation and adaptation.

As a global problem, much of the research and policy takes place in the international arena, through large scale research projects and intergovernmental negotiation forums (IPCC). However, since, on the one hand, this collective effort requires the involvement of national scientific systems and, on the other hand, local impacts demand specific responses, localised research does matter. National peculiarities regarding the political use of scientific advice and public engagement (both in science and in policy-making) also have a bearing on how this problem is dealt with.

Thus, this project aims to understand how science is tackling the challenge of climate change in Portugal, by:

- characterising the climate change research community (which researchers and institutions are involved; what research subjects are being studied; what is being researched in terms of assessment, mitigation or adaptation; which scientific disciplines are being mobilised; what sources of funding are supporting this research; what interdisciplinary, interinstitutional and international collaborations exist);

- analysing the connections between scientific advice and policy-making in what regards climate change (which experts are being called upon by local and national government to provide advice, what kind of studies are being done by government demand; whether tensions and controversies exist between experts and counter-experts);

- examining science and society relationships concerning climate change (how is scientific information being communicated to the public; what kind of public engagement with science is being promoted; whether societal issues and lay knowledge are being taken into consideration in scientific research).

The methodology of this research project will comprise several stages. The first step is to map out the community of climate change research in Portugal, by conducting a census of research projects, researchers, teams and researchers. Once the major actors have been identified, both in fundamental, applied and commissioned research, interviews will be carried out with project leaders, heads of research centres, doctoral students, local and national government officials in charge of commissioning research or scientific advice, national representatives in international bodies dealing with climate change (such as the IPCC).

This research project will then proceed to examine some case studies. From the list of ongoing research projects, a few will be selected, some concerning assessment, others mitigation, others still adaptation to climate change in Portugal. Some instances of climate change policy making with resort to scientific advice and public participation will also be selected for in-depth analysis.

These case studies will be analysed through a combination of methodologies and techniques: document analysis, interviews with stakeholders (scientists and engineers, local inhabitants, consumers/users of technological innovations, local and national government officials, NGOs, business representatives, architects), localised surveys, focus groups, and ethnographic observation.

Collaboration with teams from other countries in joint projects, for instance Spain and other Mediterranean countries that face similar challenges, is envisaged. This project will also strive to build cooperative ties with other scientific disciplines, including from the natural sciences.

It is expected that this research will contribute not just to the accumulation of scientific knowledge on this pressing issue, but also to improve public engagement with science and policy in dealing with climate change.

Objectivos: 
The main objective of this research project is to understand how science is tackling the challenge of climate change in Portugal, by characterising the climate change research community, by examining  the connections between scientific advice and policy-making (including the role of the Government in commissioning and funding research) and by analysing the science and society relationships concerning climate change. <p>The focus of this research will be the Portuguese case, although the wider international background, both scientific and political, cannot be neglected. If possible, comparative studies with other countries will be carried out.</p><p>It is expected that this research will contribute not just to the accumulation of scientific knowledge on this pressing issue, but also to improve public engagement with science and policy in dealing with climate change.</p>
State of the art: 
The core role science plays in environmental issues has been often stated and analysed (Irwin 2001; Bocking 2004). So, much like other environmental risks and problems, climate change is a privileged field for studying the interplay between science and society. Since, so far, it has been nearly invisible to human perception, it was science that raised the alarm and identified this as a serious problem (Yearley 2008: 923). But its grievous consequences make it imperious to convey scientific information to the general public and to involve citizens in the search for solutions. Disagreement among experts (real or constructed by lobby groups) has turned this issue into a classical tale of how scientific controversies can undermine public trust in science (Yearly 2008: 928). <p>Extensive scientific research and technological development are being carried out to assess, mitigate and adapt to climate change: &quot;it makes sense to invest in new knowledge. (...) Mitigation may require developing new technologies that will allow economic development while reducing the anthropogenic contributions to climate change. (...) Anticipatory adaptation will require foresight about impacts and new technological and social developments to respond to them&quot; (Rayner and Malone 1998: 4).</p><p>In the past decade, science and technology studies have devoted considerable attention to climate change. Most studies have focused on tracing the history of the discovery of climate change (e.g. Weart 2008), analysing the international collaboration underlying the IPCC (e.g. Boehmer-Christiansen 1994), understanding the ties between science and policy (e.g. Hart and Victor 1993) or examining the construction of knowledge in climatic models (e.g. Shackley and Wynne 1996; Lahsen 2005; Sundberg 2007).</p><p>Policy decisions on mitigation and adaptation measures cannot be but based on scientific evidence and advice, in a dynamics in which &quot;natural knowledge and political order are co-produced through a common social project that shores up the legitimacy of each&quot; (Jasanoff and Wynne 1998, 16; see also Miller 2001), but also on citizen participation, through networks that involve governmental actors, NGOs, business companies and communities (O'Riordan et al 1998). Previous cases (BSE, GMOs) have shown that in health and environmental issues, the involvement of stakeholders in decision-making is crucial. As a result, European and national regulations have been establishing mandatory hybrid forums for managing environmental risk, in which citizens, experts and policy makers interact (participatory environmental assessments, public hearings and debates, consensus conferences, scenario workshops). The application of such procedures to climate change has already been attempted in the EU programme Ulysses (Urban Lifestyles, Sustainability and Integrated Environmental Assessment).</p><p>Finally, it is crucial to examine whether R&amp;D endeavours are taking into consideration social needs and concerns, local knowledge and lay expertise; that is to say, if citizens are being involved in the definition of research questions, in the process of data collection or in the design and implementation of technical solutions. Mitigation and adaptation to climate change requires not just changes in the practices of governments and business companies but also in individual behaviour and consumption (see Tompkins and Adger 2005), that can only be brought about by &quot;creating shared frames of reference and opportunities for shared action&quot; (Rayner and Malone 1998: 13) and not just by providing scientific information (see Kellstedt et al 2008) and advertising new eco-friendly technologies: &quot;&quot;the focus on dynamics of technical change and how to manage it has important implications about the role of technology in climate change and the expectation (...) that sociotechnical change will be important to resolving the issues of climate change&quot; (Rip and Kemp 1998: 387).</p><p>Although climate change is a global problem, it clearly has local specificities that demand particular attention. Though far from being one of the countries most at risk, Portugal can expect some severe impacts (IPPC 2007; Santos and Miranda, 2006): extreme weather conditions, rise in sea level that leads to coastal erosion and threat to populations, floods in river basins, draught and desertification in the south, devastating wildfires, threats to important economic activities (agriculture, fishing, tourism), human health hazards (increased mobility and morbidity due to heath waves, risk of re-emergence of eradicated diseases, such as malaria, dengue, other tropical diseases).</p><p>Just like other countries, Portugal is working on assessment, mitigation and adaptation to climate change, through scientific research, technological development and policy design, both at national and international level. However, the specific conditions of the interaction between science, society and policy in Portugal have a bearing on how these issues are being tackled: &quot;The relative weakness of the Portuguese scientific system and the lack of institutionalised forms of scientific advice for public administration (...) together with an inactive civil society, has contributed to maintaining the status quo of traditional administrative practice, which is most typically centralised, hierarchised and secretive.&quot; (Gon&ccedil;alves, 2002: 250).</p><p>Citizen participation in debates and decisions of a scientific and technical nature is often dismissed as unnecessary, since the public is deemed to be ignorant, irrational and apathetic. And yet, in recent years there have been multiple cases in which citizens have mobilised to oppose local environmental risks and have been proficient in using scientific argumentation to advocate their claims (see, for instance, Gon&ccedil;alves et al 2007).</p><p>Sociological research on climate change in Portugal is still scarce. This issue has been included in some nation-wide surveys on environment (Ferreira de Almeida 2004) and risk (Gon&ccedil;alves et al 2007) but so far there has been only one dedicated study regarding policy and public opinion (Observa 2003) and another examining the media constructions around the issue (Carvalho and Pereira 2008). </p><p>References </p><p>Bocking, Stephen (2004), Nature's experts: science, politics and the environment, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press. </p><p>Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja (1994), &quot;Global climate protection policy: the limits of scientific advice&quot;, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 4 (2): 140-159. </p><p>Carvalho, Anabela and Eul&aacute;lia Pereira, (2008), &quot;Communicating climate change in Portugal: a critical analysis of journalism and beyond&quot;, In Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions, ed. A. Carvalho, Braga: Centro de Estudos de Comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o e Sociedade: 126-156.</p><p>Ferreira de Almeida, J. (coord) (2004), Os Portugueses e o Ambiente: II Inqu&eacute;rito Nacional &agrave;s Representa&ccedil;&otilde;es e Pr&aacute;ticas dos Portugueses sobre o Ambiente, Oeiras: Celta Editora.</p><p>Gon&ccedil;alves, M. E. (2002), &quot;Implementation of EIA directives in Portugal: How changes in civic culture are challenging political and administrative practice&quot;, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22: 249-269. </p><p>Gon&ccedil;alves, M. E. et al (2007), Os Portugueses e os Novos Riscos, Lisbon: Imprensa de Ci&ecirc;ncias Sociais</p><p>Hart, David M., and G. Victor (1993), &quot;Scientific Elites and the Making of US Policy for Climate Change Research&quot;, 1957-74. Social Studies of Science 23: 643-680. </p><p>IPCC - International Panel on Climate Change (2007), Fourth Assessment Report Working Group II Report &quot;Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability&quot; http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg2.htm </p><p>Irwin, Alan (2001), Sociology and the Environment, Cambridge: Polity Press </p><p>Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998), &quot;Science and decision making&quot;, in Human Choice and Climate Change - vol. 1 The Societal Framework, ed. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, Columbus: Batelle Press: 1-88 </p><p>Kellstedt, P. M et al (2008), &quot;Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States&quot;, Risk Analysis, 28 (1): 113-126 </p><p>Lahsen, Myanna (2005), &quot;Seductive Simulations? Uncertainty Distribution Around Climate Models&quot;. Social Studies of Science 35(4 December): 895-922. </p><p>Miller, C. (2001), &quot;Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime&quot; Science, Technology, &amp; Human Values, 26 (4): 478-500 </p><p>O'Riordan, T. et al (1998), &quot;Institutional frameworks for political action&quot;, in Human Choice and Climate Change - vol. 1 The Societal Framework, ed. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, Columbus: Batelle Press: 345-440</p><p>OBSERVA (2003), Altera&ccedil;&otilde;es clim&aacute;ticas no quotidiano - Relat&oacute;rio final, http://observa.iscte.pt/docs/Relatorio%20Final%20Alteracoes%20Climaticas.pdf</p><p>Rayner, S. and Malone, E. L. (1998), Human Choice and Climate Change - vol. 4 What have we learned?, Columbus: Batelle Press </p><p>Rip, A. and Kemp, R. (1998), &quot;Technological change&quot; in Human Choice and Climate Change - vol. 2 Resources and Technology, ed. S. Rayner and E. L. Malone, Columbus: Batelle Press: 327-399 </p><p>Santos, F. D. and Miranda, P. (eds.) (2006), Altera&ccedil;&otilde;es clim&aacute;ticas em Portugal: cen&aacute;rios, impactos e medidas de adapta&ccedil;&atilde;o, Lisbon: Gradiva</p><p>Shackley, S. and Wynne, B. (1996), &quot;Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority &quot;, Science, Technology &amp; Human Values, 21 (3): 275-302 </p><p>Sundberg, Mikaela (2007), &quot;Parameterizations as Boundary Objects on the Climate Arena&quot;. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 473-488. </p><p>Tompkins, E. L. and Adger, W. N. (2005), &quot;Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy&quot;, Environmental Science &amp; Policy, 8 (6): 562-571 </p><p>Weart, Spencer R. (2008), The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. </p><p>Yearley, S. (2007), &quot;Nature and the Environment in Science and Technology Studies&quot;, in E. J. Hackett et al (eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge: MIT Press: 921-947 </p>
Parceria: 
Unintegrated
Coordenador ICS 
Referência externa 
PROJ106/2009
Start Date: 
01/06/2009
End Date: 
01/05/2014
Duração: 
59 meses
Closed