Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

ICS

W

O

R

K

I

N

G

P

A

P

E

R

S

2016

representation as an alternative to liberal democracy, namely as constituencies of legislative

chambers or councils that were established in many authoritarian regimes during the 20th

century

. 21

However, there were differences between the Catholic corporatist formulations of

the late-19th century and the integral corporatist proposals of some fascist and radical-right-

wing parties. When we look at fascist party programmes and segments of the radical right,

like the Action Française-inspired

movements, the picture is even clearer, with many

reinforcing ‘integral corporatism’ vis-à-vis the social corporatism of Catholicism. Two

examples are sufficient to illustrate this tension.

In the Spanish Second Republic, the Spanish Confederation of the Independent Right (CEDA –

Confederación Española de Derechas Autónomas), formed in 1933 through the unification of

a number of conservative Catholic groups and the first party based ‘on a politically-mobilized

mass Catholicism’ (which for electoral reasons was poorly defined), called for the

establishment of ‘a corporatist, Catholic and conservative republic’ similar to the one created

by Salazar in neighbouring Portugal and that of Dolfuss in Austria

. 22

When José Antonio Primo

de Rivera established the Spanish Falange (Falange Española), it was immediately suggested

parliament be replaced by a system of corporatist representation that recognized the family,

the municipality, the union, the business organization and the corporation ‘as the authentic

basis of state organization’.

23

However, in an attempt to differentiate its political programme

from that of CEDA, the Falange strengthened its revolutionary programme, which included

the nationalization of the banks, and José Antonio managed to unmask some of the

conservative dimensions of the corporatist state.

24

In inter-war Belgium, where the Catholic unions believed the authoritarian models – even

those of the Portuguese New State – were ‘statist’ and not to be followed (they even avoided

using the word), the right-wing of the Catholic party was inclined to view them positively.

25

For those on the extreme right of the Catholic party, corporatism had to be ‘the basis of

political representation and a means of organizing the working class, which had lost all of its

independence’

. 26

‘Some Catholics were sympathetic towards the authoritarian regimes in

Portugal and Austria. Corporatism was an important aspect, but few Catholics wanted to

replace democracy with a corporatist and authoritarian regime’

. 27

Despite the differences

between Flemish and Walloons in a Catholic subculture more sensitive to the working class in

the former and more mistrustful of the ‘masses’ in the latter, corporatism permeated the

political culture of the conservative elites – particularly the Catholic elite; however, their

6