Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

ICS

W

O

R

K

I

N

G

P

A

P

E

R

S

2017

mere exposure to the norm of meritocracy should be sufficient to increase the levels of implicit

prejudice towards those groups. Therefore, we expected the activation of a meritocratic norm

to increase the expression of implicit prejudice towards low-status groups.

Overview

We report two experiments designed to investigate the effects of priming meritocracy

on the levels of implicit prejudice that individuals display towards a low-status group. In both

experiments, we measured (Dutch participants’) implicit negative associations towards

Moroccans, currently a strongly stigmatized low-status group in the Netherlands (Verkuyten &

Zaremba, 2005) where the studies took place. We manipulate the meritocratic norm in either a

more manifest (Study 1) or a more subtle way (Study 2) and we measure implicit prejudice

using a Single-Target IAT (Study 1) or an Affective Priming Task (Study 2).

Study 1

In this first study, participants were asked to take part in two supposedly unrelated

studies. After arriving in the lab, participants took part in a task presented as a

Text

Comprehension Task

that served to manipulate the meritocratic norm. After this first task, all

participants completed a Single Target IAT (see, Dotsch & Wigboldüs, 2008; Wigboldüs,

Holland & van Knippenberg, 2004). We expected to observe higher levels of prejudice in the

condition of meritocracy than in the neutral condition.

Method

Participants and design

Forty-two Dutch students (84% female; mean age = 22.3 yrs) took part in the

experiment in exchange for partial course credit or a token with a value of Eur 5. Participants

were randomly distributed in a unifactorial between-participants design (Meritocracy vs.

Neutral).

Manipulation of meritocracy.

The manipulation was presented as a text

comprehension task. Participants were invited to carefully read a text in order to subsequently

choose the sentence that best expresses the main idea of the text. Two different texts and two

sets of sentences represented the two different conditions. In the meritocracy condition,

participants read a text explaining how current societies are characterized by the idea of merit

5