Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  40 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

ICS

W

O

R

K

I

N

G

P

A

P

E

R

S

2016

denounced the plan as ‘revolutionary’.

175

After the Axis forces attacked the Kingdom of Yugoslavia on 6 April 1941, and its territory was

partitioned between Germany, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria and other client regimes, there were

some different strategies for political control.

176

In the case of Croatia, the Axis established

the Independent State of Croatia (NDH – Nezavisna Država Hrvatska) while most of Serbia

was placed under a German administration that gave some powers to a more fragile local

government. The NDH was established under the political leadership of Ante Pavelić and his

Ustasha – Croatian Revolutionary Movement (Ustaša – Hrvatski revolucionarni pokret). The

Ustasha movement was a radical ultra-national organization associated with fascism and

terrorist political action. Ante Pavelić, a lawyer and extreme-right politician whose main

political activity in inter-war Yugoslavia was always associated with the independence of

Croatia, went into exile in Germany and Italy on a number of occasions, which was where he

founded the Ustasha. During the 1930s, the movement was increasingly influenced by Italian

Fascism and German National Socialism. By the late 1930s, however, it was developing a

racist ideology through its demand for a ‘Gothic’ identity for all Croats and by idealizing the

peasantry. The Ustasha was fiercely Catholic, identifying Catholicism with Croatian

nationalism. As corporatism became an element of ideological convergence between the

Croat Catholic movement and Ustasha, most Catholic intellectuals in Croatia supported the

construction of a social system based on an organic view of society. As the decade

progressed, the Ustasha ‘adapted the Italian Fascist model to Croatian conditions. In the case

of corporatism, as on the national question, there was an unmistakable convergence of views

between the Ustasha and radical Catholics’

.177

The NDH was marked by improvisation and the disarticulation between the party and the

state, as well as by generalized and terrorist violence against all ‘foreigners’, particularly

Serbs, Jews and Roma. Ethnic cleansing was at the forefront of NDH ideology and

‘totalitarianism and violence remained woven into the very structure of the state’.

178

In fact,

one of the basic goals of Ustasha ideology was to create an ‘ethnically pure Croatia’.

Decision-making within the NDR was increasingly centralized in the person of Ante Pavelić,

who arbitrarily broadened and narrowed his circle of close advisers according to

circumstances and who was ‘always very unwilling to convene government meetings’.

179

The

NDH introduced most of authoritarian and fascist-inspired institutions, even though these

were often poorly developed: the single-party, a youth organization, a system of national

labour syndicates and an outline of ‘professional organization chambers’ as the beginning of a

38