Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

ICS

W

O

R

K

I

N

G

P

A

P

E

R

S

2016

through the institutionalization of corporatist representation formalized in the 1934

constitution. In this context, the influence Heimwehr fascists had on the corporatist option

cannot be understated, since it coincided with the time they had their greatest political

influence within the new regime. As they were closer to the Italian Fascist model and to

Othmar Spann, they had been proposing projects for the corporatization of the political

system since 1930.

The 1934 constitution established a period of transition, and when Hitler invaded Austria in

1938 a large part of the corporatization process had not yet left the drawing board. According

to the new constitution, the legislative structure of the Austrian New State was based on

three pillars representing self-government in economic, state and cultural politics, and

functioning as advisory bodies. They had to offer opinion on planned legislation when

requested by the government: the state council (Staatsrat), which was a kind of upper house

made up of 40-50 men of merit and character appointed by the federal president – it was

mainly concerned with matters of state and welfare; the Federal Cultural Council

(Bundeskulturrat), which had 40 members, including two women, who were all appointed by

the federal president for a six-year term; and the Federal Economic Council

(Bundeswirtschaftsrat), which was made up of 80 people and was the only body in which the

names of the seven professional corporatist bodies were listed in the constitution.

Overarching these pillars at the top of the constitutional framework was the Federal Diet

(Bundestag). This corporatist parliament consisted of 20 delegates from the state council, 10

from the federal cultural council and 20 from the Federal Economic Council. All these council

members were supposed to be elected by these councils, but after 1934 they were appointed

directly by the federal president. The Bundestag had only limited powers to decide on

proposals from and to the federal government.

In electoral terms, the organic vote was established; however, we should not forget that as

elsewhere with the absence of organized corporations these bodies were composed of

members appointed by the president and the chancellor since only two of the seven

professional corporations had been created by 1938. The CS was dominant in many of these

advisory bodies, although during the first two years of the regime the Heimwehr had more

places within them than their electoral strength in the parliament of the democratic

period

.108

The government had a great deal of autonomy in relation to these advisory

bodies, which had only limited and partial veto powers that could be circumvented by the

executive. The subjection of the legislative branch to the government left little room for the

24